WASHINGTON —
In a brief and largely overlooked exchange between Sen. Marco Rubio and America's top spy during a January hearing about Russia's alleged election meddling, the Florida Republican sketched out what he fears could be the next front in the hidden wars of cyberspace.
Could Russian hackers, Rubio asked then-Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr., hypothetically gain access to a U.S. lawmaker's computer, plant criminal evidence on the device of, say, child pornography or money laundering and then tip off law enforcement?
"It is certainly well within both their technical competence and their potential intent to do something like that," Clapper told the Senate Intelligence Committee days before stepping down in January. "I think the next trend in the cyber business will be the compromise with the fidelity of information."
‘Weaponization’ of data
The question of how Russia and other adversaries might use cybertools in the future to meddle in American politics is, of course, overshadowed for now by what U.S. intelligence agencies say was Moscow's elaborate campaign to interfere in the 2016 presidential race.
Emails reportedly stolen by Russian hackers from the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman, John Podesta, were later released to the public — something U.S. intelligence officials call the "weaponization" of data — in an effort to sow discord, discredit Clinton and, ultimately, help Donald Trump win.
Now, five months after Trump's electoral triumph, Russia's alleged interference is the focus of investigations by the FBI as well as the House and Senate Intelligence committees. All three probes are also looking into possible collusion between Moscow and the Trump campaign. Counterintelligence investigations are notoriously long and painstaking affairs, and officials have declined to provide a timeline for them to conclude.
2018 and 2020 could be a repeat
Even as investigators race to determine what exactly transpired during the 2016 presidential race, senior officials are warning that Russian meddling is not just a thing of the past. FBI Director James B. Comey said in sworn testimony last month that the Kremlin is likely to try to interfere in the 2018 midterm elections as well as the 2020 presidential race.
If the scale, scope and ambition of Moscow's 2016 cyber campaign long eluded U.S. officials, it has hit home as the investigations have pulled together the various threads of the operation.
It has also spurred officials to think about what future Russian efforts might look like. One concern is that adversaries could seek to manipulate vote counts — a scenario the Obama administration feared in the 2016 vote but one that ultimately did not come to pass.
'They can put things on your computer’
But another potential form of cyber mischief has increasingly caught the eye of members of the congressional intelligence committees: instead of stealing information, Russia could plant fake information to tarnish a public figure.
"Not only can they take things off your computer, they can put things on your computer that will compromise you," Sen. Angus King, a Maine independent, said at a hearing last month on Russian cyber operations. "I think that should send a shudder through all Americans that this isn't only taking — you can be very careful in your emails but something can show up on your computer that's fake and you could be in a lot of trouble."
It is a technique the Russians have used against critics at home and in Europe, experts say.
The curious case of Vladimir Bukovsky
Russian dissident Vladimir Bukovsky claims he was the target of just such methods. British police searched Bukovsky's home in Cambridge after receiving a tip about illegal materials — child pornography — and confiscated his computers. Bukovsky has said he is the victim of a smear campaign involving data planted on his devices by a third party, in this case Russia.
Prosecutors say he downloaded the illegal images over a 15-year period. The trial began in December but was postponed after Bukovsky was hospitalized.
The Bukovsky case, as well as similar incidents elsewhere in Europe, have generated concerns in the United States about Russia employing similar tactics here to go after public officials.
The use of compromising information — real or contrived — to discredit an adversary is an age-old trick in the world of espionage. The Soviet KGB was particularly adept at it.
"Doing those sorts of activities to ruin, for example, a politician or a diplomat's reputation with fake or true but misleading information, those are long-standing techniques," said Christopher Porter, a former CIA official now with the cybersecurity company FireEye. "There's nothing new about that."
From far away, with minimal risk
What is new, Porter said, is that cybertools give countries the ability to carry out such operations from far away, with minimal risk and at scale.
In other words, modern technology has made it much easier to conduct such operations now than in the past, when intelligence agencies needed a large team, sometimes spread across several countries, to successfully compromise a public figure. Now, all it takes is a small group of cyberwarriors working on computers in an office from the safety of their homeland.
A global threat
Their reach, meanwhile, extends to nearly any computer across the globe.
"Even if you live in your capital and even if the country you live in has a skilled police force and good intelligence services, they can't necessarily protect you as an individual from that adversary cyberthreat group going after you," Porter said.
The U.S. government isn't going to help, either, Porter said, noting that only things defined as critical infrastructure, such as the power grid, gets federal protection.
"So individuals, even if they're politically important, their personal accounts aren't defended in the same way that their government accounts are," he said.
The past few years have provided ample evidence that private accounts are susceptible to being hacked. In 2015, CIA Director John O. Brennan's personal email account was hacked. And then, of course, there's also Podesta's Gmail account.
Insider says forensics will expose hacking
In the case of compromising evidence on a public official's computer, some say the fears expressed by Rubio and others are legitimate but perhaps overblown.
One former senior U.S. official said that if a prominent official is ensnared in a scenario like the one spelled out by Rubio, U.S. law enforcement would conduct a rigorous forensic examination to ensure the veracity of the allegations.
The evidence, in such an instance, "would be endlessly scrutinized," particularly since the idea of a third party planting evidence on a device is now frequently brought up in cases involving compromising digital data, the former U.S. official said on condition of anonymity.
But the official pointed to a potential ripple effect of such fears about Russia's cyber reach: the potential chilling of free speech and people's willingness to stake out strong positions against Russia.
"They're worried because they're hawks that they're going to get targeted," the former official said.
Read the whole story
· · · · ·
4.28.17 - F
- Among Trump aides, Mattis emerges as a key voice on national security issues - The Washington Post
- Tillerson Keeping ‘All Options’ Open if Diplomacy With North Korea Fails - The New York Times
- Russian navy intelligence ship sinks after collision with freighter off Turkish coast - The Washington Post
- Russian mafia groups reportedly operate in Europe on behalf of the Kremlin | Europe | DW.COM | 27.04.2017
- Donald Trump and Russia: The Spanish connection with Trump’s Russia scandal | In English | EL PAÍS
- Facebook Hints You-Know-Who Tried To Manipulate U.S. Election
- Lawmakers Wary of Russia’s Ability to Plant Cyber Dirt
- Pentagon Inquiry Seeks to Learn if Flynn Hid Foreign Payment - The New York Times
- Analysis: How the state of Russian media becomes the state of international media - Chicago Tribune
- Эксперты рассказали, как Россия пытается повлиять на выборы во Франции | Новости в 'Час Пик'
- Marine Le Pen rarely mentions gender...
- Trump Isn’t Anti-L.G.B.T. - The New York Times
- How 'The Simpsons' turned around a timely 'Trump's first 100 days' spoof - The Washington Post
Searches - 4.28.17
- News - Russian mafia - Google Search
- News - trump treacherous tape russia deal palmer - Google Search
- Russan mafia - Google Search
- trump treacherous tape russia deal palmer - Google Search
- trump treacherous tape - Google Search
- French Elections - Google Search
- trump - Google Search
- james mattis - Google Search
- russian mafia and trump tower - Google Search
- russian mafia and trump - Google Search
- Russian mafia and US elections 2016 - Google Search
- Facebook admits 'malicious actors'...
- News - Russia's ability to plant dirt fake evidence on computers - Google Search
- Russia's ability to plant dirt fake evidence on computers - Google Search
Posts - 4.28.17
- RUSSIA and THE WEST - РОССИЯ и ЗАПАД: Russian mafia groups reportedly operate in Europe on behalf of the Kremlin | Europe | DW.COM | Russian intelligence ship sinks - 4.27.17: "You Zar ("Sith"), si (see, ssi) f...... H(anging) - (by the herd of sheep)" - News - "Youzarsif H" - Google Search | Putin a 'dark Sith Lord' as Russia spreads fake news, NATO seminar told - The Sydney Morning Herald | Russia-West, Syria Tensions Exposed at Moscow Security Conference Friday April 28th, 2017 at 7:48 AM
- RUSSIA and THE WEST - РОССИЯ и ЗАПАД: » Mike Nova's Shared NewsLinks: Планы генерального масштаба – Газета Коммерсантъ № 74 (6068) от 27.04.2017 28/04/17 09:25 from 1. My News Blogs from mikenova (2 sites) mikenova shared this story . Минобороны РФ вчера открыло в Моск...
- News Reviews and Opinions: 1. Recent Events Review Daily from mikenova
- News Reviews and Opinions: 4.28 - 27.17: Russian mafia groups reportedly operate in Europe on behalf of the Kremlin | Europe | DW.COM | 27.04.2017 | Israel's intelligence minister urges US to team up with Russia against Iran
- News Reviews and Opinions: Recent Events Review Daily
- News Reviews and Opinions: Russian mafia groups reportedly operate in Europe on behalf of the Kremlin | Europe | DW.COM: "The report claims there is a close connection between the Kremlin's state security apparatus represented by the Foreign Intelligence Service, military intelligence (GRU), and the Federal Security Service (FSB) and Russian organized criminal groups active in European countries. Moreover, the Kremlin often tasks these groups to act on its behalf. "The Russian state is highly criminalised, and the interpenetration of the criminal ‘underworld’ and the political ‘upperworld’ has led the regime to use criminals from time to time as instruments of its rule," the ECFR study said."
- News Reviews and Opinions: My News Blogs - from Mike Nova
Russia - 4.28.17
- СМИ узнали о времени для уничтожения спецаппаратуры утонувшего «Лимана» :: Общество :: РБК
- Россия предложила США дружить доменами
- СМИ: экипаж «Лимана» успел уничтожить секретную аппаратуру - Свободная Пресса - Война в Сирии. Новости Сирии. Фото. Сирия 2017.
Moscow security conference highlights... - 4.28.17
- Moscow security conference highlights...
- Russia ready to mend ties with NATO: Military chief
- США и НАТО понизили градус...
- США и НАТО понизили градус конференции по безопасности в Москве / Воины и Армии / Независимая газета
- Планы генерального масштаба – Газета Коммерсантъ № 74 (6068) от 27.04.2017
- Moscow security conference highlights rift between Russia, NATO
- Новости мира - Главная проблема НАТО не оборонные бюджеты, а Россия - zn.ua
- -
Read the whole story
· · · ·
Lawmakers wary of Russia's ability to plant dirt, fake evidence on ...
MyAJC-3 hours ago
Could Russian hackers, Rubio asked then-Director of National ... to a U.S. lawmaker's computer, plant criminal evidence on the device of, say, ...
Lawmakers Wary of Russia's Ability to Plant Cyber Dirt
Roll Call-Apr 26, 2017
Lawmakers Wary of Russia's Ability to Plant Cyber Dirt ... concerned about being compromised by fake information planted on their computers, ... access to a U.S. lawmaker's computer, plant criminal evidence on the device of, ...
In a brief and largely overlooked exchange between Sen. Marco Rubio and America’s top spy during a January hearing about Russia’s alleged election meddling, the Florida Republican sketched out what he fears could be the next front in the hidden wars of cyberspace.
Could Russian hackers, Rubio asked then-Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr., hypothetically gain access to a U.S. lawmaker’s computer, plant criminal evidence on the device of, say, child pornography or money laundering and then tip off law enforcement?
“It is certainly well within both their technical competence and their potential intent to do something like that,” Clapper told the Senate Intelligence Committee days before stepping down in January. “I think the next trend in the cyber business will be the compromise with the fidelity of information.”
The question of how Russia and other adversaries might use cybertools in the future to meddle in American politics is, of course, overshadowed for now by what U.S. intelligence agencies say was Moscow’s elaborate campaign to interfere in the 2016 presidential race.
Emails reportedly stolen by Russian hackers from the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, John Podesta, were later released to the public — something U.S. intelligence officials call the “weaponization” of data — in an effort to sow discord, discredit Clinton and, ultimately, help Donald Trump win.
Now, five months after Trump’s electoral triumph, Russia’s alleged interference is the focus of investigations by the FBI as well as the House and Senate Intelligence committees. All three probes are also looking into possible collusion between Moscow and the Trump campaign. Counterintelligence investigations are notoriously long and painstaking affairs, and officials have declined to provide a timeline for them to conclude.
Even as investigators race to determine what exactly transpired during the 2016 presidential race, senior officials are warning that Russian meddling is not just a thing of the past. FBI Director James B. Comey said in sworn testimony last month that the Kremlin is likely to try to interfere in the 2018 midterm elections as well as the 2020 presidential race.
Fake information
If the scale, scope and ambition of Moscow’s 2016 cyber campaign long eluded U.S. officials, it has hit home as the investigations have pulled together the various threads of the operation.
It has also spurred officials to think about what future Russian efforts might look like. One concern is that adversaries could seek to manipulate vote counts — a scenario the Obama administration feared in the 2016 vote but one that ultimately did not come to pass.
Want insight more often?
Get Roll Call in your inbox
But another potential form of cyber mischief has increasingly caught the eye of members of the congressional intelligence committees: instead of stealing information, Russia could plant fake information to tarnish a public figure.
“Not only can they take things off your computer, they can put things on your computer that will compromise you,” Sen. Angus King, a Maine independent, said at a hearing last month on Russian cyber operations. “I think that should send a shudder through all Americans that this isn’t only taking — you can be very careful in your emails but something can show up on your computer that’s fake and you could be in a lot of trouble.”
It is a technique the Russians have used against critics at home and in Europe, experts say.
Russian dissident Vladimir Bukovsky claims he was the target of just such methods. British police searched Bukovsky’s home in Cambridge after receiving a tip about illegal materials — child pornography — and confiscated his computers. Bukovsky has said he is the victim of a smear campaign involving data planted on his devices by a third party, in this case Russia.
Prosecutors say he downloaded the illegal images over a 15 year period. The trial began in December but was postponed after Bukovsky was hospitalized.
The Bukovsky case, as well as similar incidents elsewhere in Europe, have generated concerns in the United States about Russia employing similar tactics here to go after public officials.
The use of compromising information — real or contrived — to discredit an adversary is an age-old trick in the world of espionage. The Soviet KGB was particularly adept at it.
“Doing those sorts of activities to ruin, for example, a politician or a diplomat’s reputation with fake or true but misleading information, those are longstanding techniques,” said Christopher Porter, a former CIA official now with the cybersecurity firm FireEye. “There’s nothing new about that.”
What is new, Porter said, is that cybertools give countries the ability to carry out such operations from far away, with minimal risk and at scale.
In other words, modern technology has made it much easier to conduct such operations now than in the past, when intelligence agencies needed a large team, sometimes spread across several countries, to successfully compromise a public figure. Now, all it takes is a small group of cyberwarriors working on computers in an office from the safety of their homeland.
Personal accounts
Their reach, meanwhile, extends to nearly any computer across the globe.
“Even if you live in your capital and even if the country you live in has a skilled police force and good intelligence services, they can’t necessarily protect you as an individual from that adversary cyberthreat group going after you,” Porter said.
The U.S. government isn’t going to help, either, Porter said, noting that only things defined as critical infrastructure, such as the power grid, gets federal protection.
“So individuals, even if they’re politically important, their personal accounts aren’t defended in the same way that their government accounts are,” he said.
The past few years have provided ample evidence that private accounts are susceptible to being hacked. In 2015, CIA Director John O. Brennan’s personal email account was hacked. And then, of course, there’s also Podesta’s Gmail account.
In the case of compromising evidence on a public official’s computer, some say the fears expressed by Rubio and others are legitimate but perhaps overblown.
One former senior U.S. official said that if a prominent official is ensnared in a scenario like the one spelled out by Rubio, U.S. law enforcement would conduct a rigorous forensic examination to ensure the veracity of the allegations.
The evidence, in such an instance, “would be endlessly scrutinized,” particularly since the idea of a third party planting evidence on a device is now frequently brought up in cases involving compromising digital data, the former U.S. official said on condition of anonymity.
But the official pointed to a potential ripple effect of such fears about Russia’s cyber reach: the potential chilling of free speech and people’s willingness to stake out strong positions against Russia.
“They’re worried because they’re hawks that they’re going to get targeted,” the former official said.
Get breaking news alerts and more from Roll Call on your iPhone or your Android.
Read the whole story
· · · · ·
ADVERTISEMENT
Facebook has issued a security report in which it says it found evidence of a coordinated attempt to manipulate last year’s U.S. election through its platform.
In a white paper issued Thursday, members of Facebook's security team said they found evidence of “malicious actors leveraging conventional and social media … with the intent of harming the reputation of specific political targets.”
Though it said the company is "not in a position to make definitive attribution," it said its data “does not contradict the attribution provided by the U.S. Director of National Intelligence in the report dated January 6, 2017.”
Russian President Vladimir Putin was accused in a CIA report of attempting to manipulate the outcome of the U.S. election last November. A new security report from Facebook says its data "does not contradict" the CIA's conclusions. (Photo: Reuters/Sergei Karpukhin)
That report concluded that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an “influence campaign” to damage Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton and aid her Republican opponent, Donald Trump.
It also concluded “with high confidence” that Russian military intelligence was actively involved in spreading news of leaked emails from the Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign chair John Podesta.
“Fake personas were created on Facebook and elsewhere to point to and amplify awareness of this data,” Facebook said in its report, not mentioning the Podesta emails directly.
“Social media accounts and pages were created to amplify news accounts of and direct people to the stolen data. … From there, organic proliferation of the messaging and data through authentic peer groups and networks was inevitable.”
Information had little impact on election: report
But the report also suggests that the “information operations” carried out during the U.S. elections likely had little impact on the outcome.
“The reach of known operations during the U.S. election of 2016 was statistically very small compared to overall engagement on political issues,” the Facebook report stated.
The authors said the social site is taking a "multi-pronged approach" to addressing the issue, including improving its ability to identify fake Facebook accounts; supporting media literacy programs; and "monitoring the efforts of those who try to negatively manipulate civic discourse
on Facebook."
Read the whole story
· · ·
Facebook admits 'malicious actors' spread misinformation during the 2016 U.S. election
Recode - 3 hours ago
It also cites a government report that found Russia played a major role in the presidential race. by Tony Romm and Kurt Wagner Apr 28, 2017, 2:50pm EDT. tweet · share · Linkedin. Almost six months after a U.S. presidential election that was rife with ...
Facebook gearing up to fight political propaganda
The Spokesman-Review - 1 hour ago
In this April 18 photo, conference workers speak in front of a demo booth at Facebook's annual F8 developer conference in San Jose, Calif. In a paper posted online on Thursday Facebook security researchers said the company will monitor the efforts of ...
Facebook, for the first time, acknowledges election manipulation
CBS News - 5 hours ago
Without saying the words "Russia," "Hillary Clinton," or "Donald Trump," Facebook acknowledged Thursday for the first time what others have been saying for months. In a paper released by its security division, the company said "malicious actors" used ...
Bots aren't spreading fake news on Facebook; humans are
Quartz - 4 hours ago
Facebook published a new paper this week outlining how it's dealing with government-backed attempts to influence politics in other countries, or what it's calling “information operations.” One of its findings refutes the notion that bots are the ...
Facebook says governments tried to exploit network to sway elections
USA TODAY - 5 hours ago
SAN FRANCISCO — Less than six months ago, Mark Zuckerberg shrugged off the idea that fake news on Facebook swayed the outcome of the U.S. presidential election as "pretty crazy." Now Facebook is vowing to shut down "information operators" after the ...
No comments:
Post a Comment